Op-ed / Material World

Meet the Ancient Technologists Who Changed Everything

A series of Stone Age geniuses invented a range of technologies that shaped human evolution and laid the foundation for our world.
Beige, brown, and gray beads that are small and round lie clustered together on a black surface beside a red, beige, and blue box with a person on it.

The idea of crafting and using beads as ornamentation may have spread from North Africa outward to other parts of the African continent and to Europe.

Nicholas R. Longrich

This article was originally published at The Conversation and has been republished under Creative Commons.

For the first few million years of human evolution, technologies changed slowly. Some 3 million years ago, our ancestors were making chipped stone flakes and crude choppers. Two million years ago, hand axes. A million years ago, humans sometimes used fire, but with difficulty. Then, 500,000 years ago, technological change accelerated, as spear points, fire-making, axes, beads, and bows appeared.

This technological revolution wasn’t the work of one people. Innovations arose in different groups—modern Homo sapiens, early sapiens, possibly even Neanderthals—and then spread. Many key inventions were unique: one-offs. Instead of being invented by different people independently, they were discovered once, then shared. That implies a few clever people created many of history’s big inventions.

And not all of them were modern humans.


Around 500,000 years ago in Southern Africa, archaic H. sapiens first bound stone blades to wooden spears, creating the spear point. Spear points were revolutionary as weaponry and as the first “composite tools”—combining components.

The spear point spread, appearing 300,000 years ago in East Africa and the Mideast, then 250,000 years ago in Europe wielded by Neanderthals. That pattern suggests the spear point was gradually passed on from one people to another, all the way from Africa to Europe.


A piece of wood with four holes in it rests on ashes beside red, orange, and yellow glowing embers.

The Hadzabe, a contemporary community of hunter-gatherers in northern Tanzania, use fire drills (shown here)—a longstanding strategy for reliably creating fire.

Nicholas R. Longrich

Four hundred thousand years ago hints of fire, including charcoal and burnt bones, became common in Europe, the Mideast, and Africa. It happened roughly the same time everywhere—rather than randomly in disconnected places—suggesting invention, then rapid spread. Fire’s utility is obvious, and keeping a fire going is easy. Starting a fire is harder, however, and was probably the main barrier. If so, widespread use of fire likely marked the invention of the fire drill—a stick spun against another piece of wood to create friction, a tool still used today by hunter-gatherers.

Curiously, the oldest evidence for regular fire use comes from Europe—then inhabited by Neanderthals. Did Neanderthals master fire first? Why not? Their brains were as big as ours; they used them for something, and living through Europe’s ice-age winters, Neanderthals needed fire more than African H. sapiens.


Two hundred and seventy thousand years ago in Central Africa, hand axes began to disappear, replaced by a new technology, the core axe. Core axes looked like small, fat hand axes but were radically different tools. Microscopic scratches show core axes were bound to wooden handles—making a true, hafted axe. Axes quickly spread through Africa, then were carried by modern humans into the Arabian peninsula, Australia, and ultimately Europe.


The oldest beads are 140,000 years old and come from what is today Morocco. They were made by piercing snail shells, then stringing them on a cord. At the time, archaic H. sapiens inhabited North Africa, so their makers weren’t modern humans.

Beads then appeared in Europe 115,000–120,000 years ago, worn by Neanderthals, and may finally have been adopted by modern humans in Southern Africa 70,000 years ago.


The oldest arrowheads appeared in Southern Africa over 70,000 years ago, likely made by the ancestors of the Bushmen, who’ve lived there for 200,000 years. Bows then may have spread to modern humans in East Africa, to South Asia 48,000 years ago, on to Europe 40,000 years ago, and finally to the Americas 12,000 years ago.

Neanderthals never adopted bows, but the timing of the bow’s spread means it was likely used by H. sapiens against them.


It’s not impossible that people invented similar technologies in different parts of the world at roughly the same time, and in some cases, this must have happened. But the simplest explanation for the archaeological data we have is that instead of reinventing technologies, many advances were made just once, then spread widely. After all, assuming fewer innovations requires fewer assumptions.

But how did technology spread? It’s unlikely individual ancient people traveled long distances through lands held by hostile tribes (although there were obviously major migrations over generations), so humans in Africa probably didn’t meet Neanderthals in Europe, or vice versa. Instead, technology and ideas diffused—transferred from one band and tribe to the next, and the next, in a vast chain linking modern H. sapiens in Southern Africa to archaic humans in North and East Africa, and Neanderthals in Europe.

One person could literally change the course of history.

Conflict could have driven exchange, with people stealing or capturing tools and weapons. Some Native Americans, for example, got horses by capturing them from the Spanish. But it’s likely that people often just traded technologies, simply because it was safer and easier. Even today, modern hunter-gatherers, who often lack money, still trade—Hadzabe hunters exchange honey for iron arrowheads made by neighboring tribes, for example.

Archaeology shows such trade is ancient. Ostrich eggshell beads from South Africa, up to 30,000 years old, have been found over 300 kilometers from where they were made. About 200,000–300,000 years ago, archaic H. sapiens in East Africa used tools from obsidian sourced from 50–150 kilometers away, farther than modern hunter-gatherers typically travel.

Last, we shouldn’t overlook human generosity—some exchanges may simply have been gifts. Human history was doubtless full of conflict, but then as now, tribes may have had peaceful interactions—treaties, marriages, friendships—and may simply have gifted technology to their neighbors.


The pattern seen here—single origin, then spread of innovations—has another remarkable implication. Progress may have been highly dependent on single individuals, rather than being the inevitable outcome of larger cultural forces.

Consider the bow. It’s so useful that its invention seems both obvious and inevitable. But if it really was obvious, we’d see bows invented repeatedly in different parts of the world. But Native Americans likely didn’t invent the bow—neither did Indigenous Australian peoples, nor people in Europe and Asia.

Instead, it seems one clever Bushman may have invented the bow, and then everyone else adopted it. That hunter’s invention would change the course of human history for thousands of years to come, determining the fates of peoples and empires.

A person with their back to the camera wearing a light-brown, sleeveless top and khaki shorts aims a bow and arrow upward. They are standing in an open grassy space with trees and a large hill in the distance.

An archer from the Hadzabe community in northern Tanzania shows the skillfulness required in successfully using a bow and arrow—a technology that has had an immense impact on humanity.

Nicholas R. Longrich

The ancient pattern resembles what we’ve seen in historic times. Some innovations were developed repeatedly—farming, civilization, calendars, pyramids, mathematics, writing, and beer were invented independently around the world, for example. Certain inventions may be obvious enough to emerge in a predictable fashion in response to people’s needs.

But many key innovations—the wheel, gunpowder, the printing press, stirrups, the compass—seem to have been invented just once before becoming widespread.

And likewise a handful of individuals—Steve Jobs, Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, the Wright brothers, James Watt, Archimedes—played outsized roles in driving our technological evolution, which implies highly creative individuals had a huge impact.

That suggests the odds of hitting on a major technological innovation are low. Perhaps it wasn’t inevitable that fire, spear points, axes, beads, or bows would be discovered when they were.

Then, as now, one person could literally change the course of history, with nothing more than an idea.

Nicholas R. Longrich is a paleontologist and evolutionary biologist from Kodiak, Alaska, who is currently a senior lecturer at the University of Bath in England. He studies dinosaurs, pterosaurs, fossil birds, lizards, and snakes. Longrich is particularly interested in the idea that macroevolution is more than just lots of microevolution—that over long periods of time, at large scales, and in the evolution of complex structures, the processes of evolution itself have evolved.


You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license.

In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.


We’re glad you enjoyed the article! Want to republish it?

This article is currently copyrighted to SAPIENS and the author. But, we love to spread anthropology around the internet and beyond. Please send your republication request via email to editor•sapiens.org.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.