Essay / Wayfinding

Restoring Faces and Dignity to Skeletal Remains

An anthropologist explains how a South African university used community-driven research to honor human remains acquired unethically.
A pair of hands arrange two placards covered with images of two different people’s faces on a table covered with a black tablecloth.

New research has dug deeper into the lives of the Sutherland Nine, people whose remains were unethically donated to the University of Cape Town in the 1920s.

This article was originally published at The Conversation and has been republished with Creative Commons.

IT HAS BEEN NEARLY 100 years since the skeletonized remains of nine people were removed from their graves on a farm near the town of Sutherland in South Africa’s Northern Cape province. They were donated to the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) anatomy department by Carel Gert Coetzee, who had unearthed them and was a medical student at the university.

The remains belonged to San and Khoekhoe people, two Indigenous groups in present-day South Africa. Their families were not consulted about the removal and donation.

This, sadly, was not unusual for the time. Anatomy departments and museums around the world collected human skeletal remains during the colonial era and into the first half of the 20th century. They were displayed in museums or studied for scientific purposes, often with a racial lens depicting Indigenous people as “primitive” and inferior.

I am an associate professor in what is today the Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology. In 2017, after encouragement by other museums and universities in South Africa, I completed an archival record review with the aim to identify remains that had been unethically obtained. That was when I came across the Sutherland collection. I immediately realized that at UCT, we had a moral and ethical duty to return the remains to their community.

A public participation adviser, Doreen Februarie, was appointed to approach the community. UCT’s senior leadership and I, represented by Loretta Feris, thought they would merely request the return of the remains for reburial. They did—but first, the descendent families asked the university to study the remains with a view to learning more about their ancestors’ lives.

On a grassy field with a road winding in the distance, a person with cornrows wearing fuchsia lipstick, a floral shirt, and a pink cardigan speaks while gesturing with their hands.

Public participation consultant Doreen Februarie discusses the return of the skeletal remains during a visit to Sutherland in the Northern Cape.

We presented those research results in a single, large, multi-authored publication.

We traced historical records, conducted archaeological fieldwork, analyzed the physical remains, and conducted biomolecular analyses. Facial reconstructions were completed for eight of the nine people—now known as the Sutherland Nine.

The Sutherland example may set a global precedent for a process of restitution and restorative justice in combination with community-driven science. My hope is that more curators and custodians of human skeletal remains elsewhere in the world will attempt to redress some of the wrongs of the past.


To ensure that we reached the right people in Sutherland, a public participation adviser was chosen to lead a process with the community. By then, I had studied the archival records related to the donation; these revealed names and two surnames. The community elected those carrying the same surnames as their representatives.

People were shocked and dismayed at the situation. But they also wanted to know who the nine had been and how their remains came to be at the university.

Our answers were limited. When I realized in 2017 that the remains had been unethically obtained, the department placed a moratorium on studying them. The community requested that this be lifted: They wanted them studied to understand the people and the situation. Once this was done, they wanted the remains returned so the Nine could be reburied properly.

As our research unfolded, we decided to present the results in a single publication. The more common approach would have been to publish several individual papers, focusing on the science. We decided instead to tell the story of the Nine with science as the background.

From the shoulders up, a person with short, coiled, graying hair wearing head and neck jewelry stares at the viewer in front of a pitch-black background.
From the shoulders up, a person with short, coiled, black hair and a mustache stares at the viewer in front of a pitch-black background.

We obtained informed consent from the community at every step of the process. The family members wrote in their own words what research they wanted and why, along with their restrictions on data use. For instance, they didn’t want any photos of the actual bones to be published—only digital renderings could be used. They also asked that the DNA sequences obtained from each of the Nine be kept private after scientific verification through peer review. And if anyone wants to conduct future research, they must approach the families to begin a new process.

The families of the Nine were also asked whether they wanted to be listed as authors in the eventual publications. Collectively, they chose formal acknowledgment in lieu of authorship.


It is impossible to summarize all our research findings here. Overall, though, we found that life was physically hard and violent for the Sutherland Nine. One died as recently as 1913; the remaining seven died in the 1870s or 1880s.

When the late professor of anatomy M.R. Drennan took delivery of the remains in the 1920s, he also noted what little the donor knew about the people’s lives. Most adults were identified by first names (Cornelius, Klaas, Saartje, Jannetje, Voetje, Totje). For two, surnames were also specified: Cornelius Abraham and Klaas Stuurman.

The descendent families have collaborated with the National San Council to rename the unnamed individuals.

The younger boy child (4–6 years of age) has been named G!ae, from the N/uu language; it translates to “springbok”—an animal symbolizing the San’s pride in their culture and future prosperity. The older girl child (6–8 years of age) has been named Saa, which translates to “eland,” a sacred and spiritual animal in San culture.

Two people sit at a long table behind white folded name labels and microphones. The left-most person wears a gray camo hoodie and has a mustache and beard, and the other wears earrings, glasses, a red shirt, and a black jacket.

Family members linked to the Sutherland skeletal remains—Alfred Stuurman (left) and Sensa Mietas (right)—speak at a press conference.

The ninth individual did not live at the same time as the others. He was an unnamed adult who, according to the donor information, was buried 40 years earlier near Sutherland, although the precise burial location was unrecorded. We used radiocarbon dating to show that he actually died about 700 years ago.

There is no evidence that this individual was directly related to the other eight, but his remains came to the institution from the same donor. He has been named Igue We, meaning “blessing,” to symbolize acceptance and blessing by San ancestors for his reburial.


The principal message of this collaborative approach is how community-driven research can benefit processes of restitution when grappling with painful legacy collections.

The reburial of the remains in Sutherland is likely to take place later this year, though no date has yet been set.

Pictured from the shoulders up, a person with shoulder-length straight, brown hair, black rimmed glasses, and a burgundy floral shirt smiles against a khaki background.

Victoria Gibbon joined the Division of Clinical Anatomy and Biological Anthropology at University of Cape Town (UCT) in 2016. In addition to her research and teaching portfolios, she is a curator of the UCT Human Skeletal Repository. This role led her to initiate restitution processes at UCT to return unethically obtained human remains and led to the establishment of updated procedures of access and stewardship for human remains at the university. Gibbon’s research and teaching interests are primarily in biological anthropology, human variation, forensic anthropology, forensic taphonomy, and bioarchaeology.


You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license.

In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.


We’re glad you enjoyed the article! Want to republish it?

This article is currently copyrighted to SAPIENS and the author. But, we love to spread anthropology around the internet and beyond. Please send your republication request via email to editor•

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.