Table of contents
Op-ed / Crisis

Can Archaeology Help Restore the Oceans?

On the Channel Islands, archaeologists draw lessons in sustainability from historic Chumash fishing practices.
Shirtless people stand in a row with their hands propped on a long wooden object in front of them. In the foreground sits a large black oval-shaped subject with colorful shells arranged on it in the shape of a swordfish.

Members of the Chumash Maritime Association pose with their tomol, or plank canoe, named Eley’wun, or swordfish.

Spencer Weiner/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

USING THE PAST FOR THE FUTURE

Off the southern California coast lies a little-known gem of the United States National Park system, Channel Islands National Park. Jutting from turquoise waters, the rocky islands harbor rich biological diversity and an archaeological record of the Chumash people and their Ancestors that extends back over 13,000 years.

For millennia, Chumash and other Indigenous communities nourished themselves by fishing rockfish from kelp forests, plucking abalone from tidal pools, and foraging the islands’ other maritime bounty. By the time Spanish explorers arrived some 500 years ago, large villages dotted island shorelines. A few thousand people dwelled in circular homes, which were dug into the ground and roofed with cattails, bulrush, and marine mammal skins.

Today Chumash descendants from the Channel Islands and adjacent mainland are thriving and undergoing a variety of revitalization efforts. This includes language reawakening and building and voyaging in tomols, or plank canoes. For decades, a handful of archaeologists have worked with these descendant communities to better understand their Ancestors’ lifeways and deep connections with the islands. This work has also revealed the history of local ecosystems—and how Chumash people sustainably drew from natural resources since the end of the last ice age.

Several people stand on a grassy cliff with green shallow water off to their left and blue water and a mountain range in the distance.

On Santa Rosa Island, archaeologists work where the Chumash village of Qshiwqshiw once stood. Shells left from the village protrude from the eroding cliff.

Todd Braje

As archaeologists long interested in the Channel Islands, we have recently shifted our attention from the past to the present and future. Our research findings and Chumash history have provided critical information for marine conservation efforts around this precious habitat.

More broadly, the work exemplifies why archaeology is a linchpin to environmental conservation: Archaeological research can uncover baselines—how ecosystems looked before humans inflicted walloping changes.

SETTING THE BASELINE

Ecological baselines provide a glimpse of past ecosystems: a sea brimming with life—from plankton to tuna; an African savanna running with gazelles and lions; North America’s grass prairies flush with bison and chirping critters.

Effective environmental conservation plans set ecological baselines at reference points prior to major human transformations such as commercial fishing, overhunting, illegal poaching, intensive agriculture, and industrialization. Without an appropriate baseline, natural scientists may arrive at false conclusions about what constitutes the “natural” world.

To reconstruct past ecosystems, archaeologists recover pollen and animal bones and teeth that indicate changes to flora and fauna. They measure the chemical composition of soils, minerals, and animal remains, which track ecological and climate conditions. And they employ genetic studies tracing the ranges, abundance, and diversity of plant and animal communities.

The research shows people do not always wreak havoc on environments. Around the globe, communities have tended landscapes and fostered biodiversity. This has been done through such practices as planting and controlled burning. Selective and sustainable foraging has benefited wildlife. For tens of thousands of years, people have imparted a range of effects on the natural world from enhancement to degradation. All of these human activities constitute important ecological baselines.

A person with their hair in a bun wearing a striped jacket and floral skirt walks down one row of a field of green crops. They pour water from two silver watering cans, holding one in each hand.

Small-scale agriculture such as this organic farm in Laos can increase a habitat’s biodiversity.

Ariel Javellana/Water Alternatives Photos/Flickr

Knowing baselines is particularly important for marine ecosystems, which face such threats as overfishing, habitat alteration, and ocean warming. The challenge is that monitoring efforts (upon which many scientists base restoration efforts) began less than 100 years ago—after the advent of commercial and industrial fishing.

Archaeological perspectives, though, can illuminate oceans as they were hundreds to thousands of years ago—and how people have influenced those ecosystems.

CHANNEL ISLAND LIFE

In Channel Islands National Park, the far eastern edge of Santa Rosa Island holds the remains of the village of Qshiwqshiw, which translates to “bird droppings” in the Chumash language. With at least 119 residents and four chiefs, Qshiwqshiw was one of the largest villages on the northern Channel Islands in the 1400s and 1500s, immediately prior to Spanish arrival.

To the untrained eye, not much is left to see. Today remnants of the village’s epicenter sit on a low-lying coastal terrace flanked by white sandy beaches and a freshwater marsh. The landscape undulates under knee-high grasses, which obscure numerous large, circular depressions. Several meters in diameter, these shallow pits were the semi-subterranean dwellings of Qshiwqshiw residents. The houses (‘ap) would have included animal skin and plant-covered roofs secured with bent poles and branches.

In the early 2000s, our team of Chumash consultants and San Diego State University archaeologists conducted small excavations at Qshiwqshiw. We were interested in a period about 1,000 ago when at least 3,000 people inhabited the northern Channel Islands.

Across the islands, people fished primarily in watersheds adjacent to their villages to harvest what they needed for themselves and their families. Especially at a village the size of Qshiwqshiw, this may have stressed or depleted local resources. We wanted to know how Chumash Ancestors managed resources and whether their tactics were sustainable.

Several measuring rulers are lined up across a dirt plot exposing several layers, some of which are packed with shell pieces.

Archaeologists examined seafood shells left from meals at Qshiwqshiw.

Todd Braje

As expected, the islanders ate a lot of seafood: Among some 2,600 fish bones, we identified more than 30 types of fish, including mackerel, perch, and barracuda. With many mouths to feed, villagers also collected easy-to-gather and process intertidal shellfish such as California mussels, marine snails, and abalone.

Yet measurements of shells from Qshiwqshiw and other large Chumash villages demonstrate a reduction in mussel and abalone size over time. This forced fishers to pursue more swimming fish.

So, the question arose: Was the strategy unsustainable?

FISHING ACROSS NOT DOWN

Looking at the Qshiwqshiw menu more closely, we noticed choices that would have helped keep the marine ecosystem humming.

Today’s commercial and industrial fisheries tend to “fish down the food web.” This means they first target species near the top of the food chain or highest trophic level, such as swordfish and tunas. High trophic level species tend to have very important ecological roles, so their loss can be catastrophic. As those animals dwindle in numbers, the fishers move down trophic levels, targeting smaller and smaller, more short-lived creatures until the ecosystem crashes, and there is nothing left to catch.

Qshiwqshiw fishers, in contrast, seemed to favor fish midway up the food chain of kelp forests. Nearly 60 percent of the fish bones we identified came from such species, including pile perch, rockfish, skates and rays, and houndsharks. Catching these fish required investment in technology (tackle, boats, line, and so on), time, patience, and local knowledge—and their fishing strategies likely minimized human impact on the ecosystem.

While focusing on mid-trophic fish, the Chumash community also caught seafood from across different habitats and levels of the food chain—from sardines to sharks. We say the residents were “fishing across, rather than down, coastal food webs.”

STABLE FOOD WEBS

To gauge whether Qshiwqshiw strategies sustained the ecosystem, we performed chemical analyses on several dozen recovered fish bones. The method revealed information about the food web’s foundation: photosynthetic organisms that capture the sun’s energy and convert it into edible sugars.

Among the key marine photosynthesizers, kelp that grows on nearshore ocean floors and phytoplankton that floats in open water carry distinct chemical signatures in their amino acids. These signals get passed up the food chain to creatures who gobble kelp or phytoplankton, to fish who eat those creatures, and so on to tuna, swordfish, and apex predators.

A chart features horizontal bars—each colored with sections of blue, green, or gray—with italicized words on their left side and a black graphic of a fish on its right side. Words such as Clupeidae, Rajidae, and Batoidea line the y-axis. Numbers “0, 1, 2, 3, 4” line the x-axis above the label “Number of specimens.” At the bottom is a color key that denotes blue as “Pelagic classification,” gray as “Mixed classification,” and green as “Kelp classification.”

In a 2023 study, researchers presented chemical analyses of fish bones, which indicated whether the animals were feeding in kelp forests (green), open water (blue), or both habitats.

Emma Elliott Smith

Measuring these signals for the Qshiwqshiw bones, we found kelp-like values, phytoplankton-like values, and some fish that showed a mix of both sources. It seems these fish, caught by Chumash Ancestors, had been feeding in kelp forests and the open sea. A millennia ago around the northern Channel Islands, offshore and nearshore habitats exchanged nutrients and the energy captured by photosynthesizers at the bottom of their food webs.

Ecologists call this “energetic coupling”: It is a marker of stable food webs.

Think about it in terms of a stock market portfolio. If you invest all your money in a single company, for example Offshore Creatures Corporation, and that company fails or its stock price tanks, you stand to lose your nest egg. Alternatively, you could diversify your portfolio and invest in multiple companies: Offshore Creatures Corporation, Kelps-R-Us, and Sandy Beaches LLC. Then if one fails, your investments in the other stocks will keep you afloat.

The same concept translates to food webs. Plant and animal communities supported by different energy sources from multiple habitats tend to be healthy and resilient. They can overcome short-term disturbances from natural climatic change or human harvest. Our research suggests that prior to Spanish arrival, the northern Channel Islands marine ecosystem was well-balanced and resilient, with nearshore, kelp forest, and offshore habitats all supporting one another.

This connectivity helped sustain Chumash fisheries and healthy marine ecosystems for millennia. Even as Chumash fishers intensified their harvest of local resources, these short-term impacts were balanced by nutrients and energy from nearby habitats. Chumash knowledge of these systems, obtained over millennia, provided the framework for targeting different habitats and organisms, and promoting sustainability.

BASELINES ARE JUST THE BEGINNING

Commercial and industrial fishing strategies are fundamentally, even catastrophically, different. These fisheries usually harvest a single species or from a single habitat, an unsustainable venture that can collapse fish stocks. Once overexploited, the fishers target new species, and the cycle begins again.

A photograph features the black silhouette of several people rowing a canoe against a background of grayish-blue water that has light reflecting off its surface.

Chumash voyagers paddle from mainland California to Santa Cruz Island, a distance of more than 20 miles.

Spencer Weiner/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images

This pattern severs the energetic links that once made habitats more resilient to human harvesting and natural climatic change. If humanity continues with business as usual, our ocean ecosystems will continue to degrade. Marine habitats will be unable to adapt to the pressures of climate change and world hunger.

Archaeology and deep history offer no panacea to the environmental challenges human beings have created and now face. But the past does provide baselines and time-tested ways to live sustainably, which should serve as models for the present and future.

A man with brown hair and a blew collared shirt faces the camera.

Todd Braje is the executive director of the Museum of Natural and Cultural History at the University of Oregon. His research focuses on long-term human-environmental interactions, the archaeology of maritime societies, historical ecological approaches to understanding coastal hunter-gatherer-fishers, and the peopling of the Americas. His forthcoming book, Understanding Imperiled Earth: How Archaeology and Human History Can Inform a Sustainable Future, will be published in 2024. Follow him on Twitter @ToddBraje.

A woman with long brown hair turns to face the camera in front of a scientific instrument.

Emma Elliott Smith is a historical ecologist and interdisciplinary scientist who studies food webs in the past and present. She received her Ph.D. from the University of New Mexico (UNM) and recently completed a Peter Buck Postdoctoral Fellowship at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. Elliott Smith is now a postdoctoral researcher and adjunct assistant professor at both San Diego State University and UNM. She is studying the changing ecology and food web dynamics of fish populations along the Pacific Coast of North America through geochemical analyses of specimens from zooarchaeological and historical contexts.

A woman with long blond wavy hair smiles at the camera.

Juliette Meling is an M.A. candidate in anthropology at San Diego State University and a state archaeologist for California’s Department of Parks and Recreation. Her research interests focus on the historical ecology of the Northern Channel Islands through the analysis of zooarchaeological materials. Meling is the author or editor of several archaeological technical reports and has extensive laboratory and field experience in southern California archaeology.

A man with a collared shirt smiles at the camera.

Torben Rick is curator of North American archaeology and a research anthropologist in anthropology at the Smithsonian’s National Museum of Natural History. Rick’s research focuses on the archaeology and historical ecology of coastal and island peoples, especially on the North American Pacific and Atlantic coasts. Rick has authored or edited eight books and dozens of scholarly articles. He received his Ph.D. and M.A. from the University of Oregon and B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara. Rick is a past chair of the Smithsonian’s Department of Anthropology, a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and a member of the National Academy of Sciences.

Republish

You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license.

In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.

Republish

We’re glad you enjoyed the article! Want to republish it?

This article is currently copyrighted to SAPIENS and the author. But, we love to spread anthropology around the internet and beyond. Please send your republication request via email to editor•sapiens.org.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.