Table of contents
Essay / Decoded

What a Shipwreck’s Tree Rings Reveal

In 1629, the Batavia, a ship of the Dutch East India Company, met disaster off the coast of Australia. A new analysis of the shipwreck’s tree rings uncovers how such vessels were built to advance European colonialism.
A close-up photo shows the cross section of a rectangular wooden plank that is light brown with swirls in the center and dark brown around the outside.

Tree rings in a cross section of an oak hull plank from the ship Batavia, which sank in 1629, hold clues to the 17th-century timber trade in Europe.

Patrick E. Baker/Western Australian Museum

This article was originally published at The Conversation and has been republished under Creative Commons.

The wrecking of the Dutch East India Company ship Batavia in 1629 is perhaps the best-known maritime disaster in Australian history. The subject of books, articles, plays, and even an opera, Batavia was wrecked on a chain of small islands off the coast of Western Australia.

Of Batavia’s 341 crew and passengers, 40 drowned trying to get off the ship, while all others made it to the uninhabited islands nearby. The captain, senior officers, two women, and one child left in one of the ship’s boats to get help. But further tragedy followed.

A group of men on the islands who had gathered around the acting commander deliberately drowned, strangled, cut the throats, or brutally hacked to death 125 children, women, and men. When the rescue party returned months later, they managed to overpower this death squad and bring the remaining survivors to safety. Together with its many victims and the murderers, Batavia’s wreckage was left in the Houtman Abrolhos archipelago.

The Dutch ship was 45.3 meters long and 600 metric tons in size. It sank on its maiden voyage to Southeast Asia. The shipwreck was found in the 1960s off Morning Reef and was excavated in the 1970s.

This illustration features a sizeable sailing ship with large beige sails on tall masts and a dark brown body with a white outline around the front of it. A smaller brown boat is just in front of the sailing ship.

A white outline in the stern section of this illustration of Batavia shows the preserved port-side and transom of the ship.

Ross Shardlow

The surviving stern section, now in Fremantle’s Western Australian Shipwrecks Museum, is the only portion of any early 17th-century Dutch East India ship raised from the seabed and preserved.

Previously, historians could only guess where the timber for such ships came from, when it was felled, or how it was used, as archival records of Dutch timber trade before 1650 are rare or lost.

But in new research, we studied the tree rings of the Batavia shipwreck timbers. We have found that the oak for the hull was sourced from two separate forests (in northern Germany and the Baltic region), with wood for the framing elements coming predominantly from the forests of Lower Saxony. The timber was processed shortly after the trees were felled (in 1625 or later) and was still green when the shipbuilders cut and bent the planks into shape.

Knowing more about these timbers helps us understand the Dutch success in world trade, including how they managed to build such large ocean-going vessels and so many of them.


Batavia’s remains provide a rare archaeological resource for tree-ring examination because exact dates of its construction and sinking are known.

Construction began sometime in the spring of 1626, and the ship set sail from Texel (the Netherlands) to the East Indies (known today as Indonesia) in October 1628. It struck a reef on June 4, 1629. As Batavia had never undergone repairs or maintenance work, we know every piece of timber belongs to the original structure.

When Batavia was built, the Dutch were the foremost shipbuilders in Europe. By 1640, for example, around 1,000 seagoing ships were being constructed in the Netherlands each year, mostly for export markets.

The Dutch lacked domestic timber resources to supply the bustling shipbuilding industry and yet would have needed hundreds, perhaps thousands, of oak trees to build Batavia.

Where did all this timber come from? The Dutch East India Company archives provide no detailed information on where its shipyards bought timber at the time of Batavia’s construction. While the company kept detailed records from the mid-17th century onward, hardly any of those from the early 1600s have survived.

Fortunately, tree rings can provide answers to those questions. Trees in temperate climate zones form a growth ring each year, just under the bark. This sequence of growth rings produced over years and decades acts like an environmental bar code, a growth pattern that is particular to the place where they grew and died.

A person wearing a dark shirt and jeans holds a borer they use on the side of the wooden body of a boat section while another person in a dark shirt stands beside them.

Marta Domínguez Delmás and Aoife Daly extract a sample from the Batavia ship with a dry-wood borer driven by a power drill.

Wendy van Duivenvoorde/Flinders University

This growth pattern is very similar for trees of the same species growing in the same area.

By measuring the ring widths from many trees, a reference tree-ring chronology can be built. Then, we can cross match the growth pattern of a specific timber to such reference chronologies, establishing when the tree was felled and where it had grown. This field of study is known as dendrochronology.

The many Batavia timbers we sampled had only heartwood, or interior rings, demonstrating that Dutch shipbuilders discarded the sapwood (outer rings). Sapwood is softer and contains substances that make it more vulnerable to insect infestation and decay.

Furthermore, the outermost heartwood ring of the Batavia hull planks that we sampled dates to 1616. When accounting for the missing sapwood (nine rings for Baltic oak), this means the trees were felled in 1625 or later.

The timber was processed shortly after the trees were felled. All this demonstrates that Batavia’s builders were skilled craftspersons, intimately familiar with the properties of the wood they used.


The oak timber used in Batavia’s hull planks came from two forests. Trees from near Lübeck in northern Germany were used above the ship’s waterline, while timber from the Baltic region of Northeastern Europe was applied exclusively below the waterline.

This Baltic timber was prized by artists like Rembrandt, who used it for panels on which to paint. Trees from this region had beautifully straight trunks with very fine growth rings, making the wood easy to work and stable.

Obviously, company shipbuilders valued these same properties when building ships strong enough to endure several return voyages to Southeast Asia. They avoided using trees with knots in the hull and preferred wood from which they could fashion long and strong planks.

Four images show black-and-white segments of a boat with highlighted portions in yellow, green, pink, blue, and purple.

These four illustrations show the distribution of the dated timbers in some parts of the Batavia shipwreck, colored by provenance (green: Baltic oak; yellow: Lübeck; blue: Lower Saxony 1; purple: Lower Saxony 2; pink: Sweden). (A) Inner hull planks, (B) Outer hull planks, (C) Transom planks, (D) Framing elements.

Aoife Daly, Marta Domínguez Delmás, Wendy van Duivenvoorde

In contrast, we found that the timber for Batavia’s framing elements came predominantly from the forests of Lower Saxony (northwest Germany). Frames utilized the strong properties of these oaks’ curved wood fibers. As it was sourced closer to home, this timber may have been cheaper and easier to acquire.

Our study was only possible because Batavia’s hull was raised in its entirety. Waterlogged wood is mushy, so extracting samples from the timbers while still under water is always challenging. It also would have required cutting out large sections of the ship to access all the different elements.

Wendy van Duivenvoorde is an associate professor in maritime archaeology at Flinders University. Her current research is focused primarily on maritime trade and shipbuilding in the ancient Mediterranean and Northern Europe. Van Duivenvoorde is an expert in late 16th- and early 17th-century Dutch shipbuilding, and her studies primarily focus on ships of exploration and Indiamen. She has also become a specialist in the study of ship’s fastenings dating to the ancient Greek and Roman periods. She has conducted research on the metal fasteners and anchors excavated from ancient Mediterranean merchantmen such as the Tektaş Burnu (440–425 B.C.) and Kyrenia (third century B.C.) shipwrecks.

Aoife Daly is the principal investigator of the project Northern Europe’s Timber Resource—Chronology, Origin, and Exploitation. This project builds a multidisciplinary team to analyze the material and written evidence for timber usage over six centuries (1100–1700). The region of origin of timber is being analyzed using several scientific methods, some of which are experimental. Identifying the timber source and the timber destination and using the high precision dating that dendrochronology provides, she studies the changes, through time, in the availability and exploitation of this essential resource.

Marta Domínguez Delmás is a research associate at the University of Amsterdam. Her research centers on the historical timber trade and transport in Northern Europe and to the Iberian Peninsula since Roman times. This work involves dendrochronological dating and provenancing of timbers from ancient and historical archaeological contexts, buildings, and art objects; identification of European wood species; inspection and sampling of timbers from shipwrecks for dendrochronological research and wood anatomy; and the development of long-span tree-ring chronologies.


You may republish this article, either online and/or in print, under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND 4.0 license. We ask that you follow these simple guidelines to comply with the requirements of the license.

In short, you may not make edits beyond minor stylistic changes, and you must credit the author and note that the article was originally published on SAPIENS.

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.


We’re glad you enjoyed the article! Want to republish it?

This article is currently copyrighted to SAPIENS and the author. But, we love to spread anthropology around the internet and beyond. Please send your republication request via email to editor•

Accompanying photos are not included in any republishing agreement; requests to republish photos must be made directly to the copyright holder.